Current guidelines recommend that choice
of antidepressant should be based on superior tolerability, safety in
overdose, and efficacy at prescribed doses.
The
improved choice of treatment options offered by the newer antidepressants has
meant that therapy is increasingly tailored to individual patient requirements.
In
more recent years many newer drugs have
been licensed and added to the original treatments for depression. The role
of these drugs relative to the older drugs is established for some of the newer
drug groups, particularly the SSRIs,
and evidence suggests that efficacy is comparable. In addition, many new drugs
have been promoted on the basis of superior tolerability and this is also
supported by clinical studies.
[An area of
particular concern with regard to initial choice of an antidepressant is the most appropriate drug for patients considered
to be a high suicide risk]
Suicide!!! It always attached with depression and antidepressant drugs too.
It
is important to remember that suicide is an
inherent risk in depression; it is generally accepted that with all antidepressant therapies the risk of suicide may
increase in the early stages of recovery. Varying relative risks of
toxicity in overdosage for different groups of antidepressant have been assessed.
In
practice, it is often difficult to identify patients at high risk for suicide, and it has therefore been suggested that a
routine strategy should be to begin antidepressant therapy in all patients
with drugs that have low toxicity in
overdose.
However,
whichever antidepressant is chosen,
all patients should be closely monitored during early therapy until
significant improvement in depression has been observed and limited
quantities of antidepressants should
be prescribed at any one time.
[No analyses
cannot determine any Antideprresants on the data reflect prescribing patterns
and patient selection as opposed to drug toxicity]
Why Trycylics Antidepressants are predominated over MAOIs and sometimes SSRIs too?
Tricyclic(TCA) antidepressants have long been preferred over MAOIs because of the problem of drug interactions and the need for
strict dietary precautions with the latter group. Tricyclics(TCA) with sedative properties may be more suitable for
agitated and anxious patients, whereas those with less sedative properties may
be preferred for withdrawn and apathetic patients. Unfortunately, the traditional tricyclics(TCA) such as amitriptyline have antimuscarinic
and cardiotoxic adverse effects that can limit their use.
Their
cardiotoxicity also means that they are associated with a high risk of
fatality in patients taking overdoses. Continuing development produced lofepramine and drugs related to the tricyclic(TCA) group such as mianserin that are less cardiotoxic
than the earlier tricyclics(TCA). •
Older tricyclics are more appropriate in severely ill, hospitalised
patients or in other situations where maximising efficacy is important.
*In
general comparison of efficacy between tricyclics(TCAs)
and SSRIs , the show no difference
in efficacy although there is the suggestion of a greater efficacy for some tricyclics when given to inpatients.
Why SSRIs are better than trycyclics(TCAs)?
Drop-out
rates due to adverse effects have
generally been higher in patients receiving tricyclics(TCAs) than in those taking SSRIs. Older tricyclics(TCA)
and the tetracyclic(TCA) maprotiline
appear to be more toxic in overdosage than the tetracyclic mianserin and the
SSRIs. Again Older tricyclics are
more toxic in overdosage, and that the SSRIs
and the newer tricyclic and related cyclic antidepressants are safer.
Why SSRIs are used for first line treatment?
Based
on some current researches from health professionals, most of them recommend
that an SSRI should be used as first-line
treatment. In addition some consider that lofepramine, nortriptyline,
or newer antidepressants such as mirtazapine or reboxetine are suitable alternatives. Bupropion, which is marketed as an antidepressant in the USA, is considered to be a firstline
choice in US guidelines.
*In
practice, SSRIs are often tried
initially because of their more favorable adverse effects profile.
What are problems with SSRI Antideprssants?
The
subsequent introduction of SSRIs
such as fluoxetine provided a group
of drugs with still fewer antimuscarinic and cardiotoxic adverse effects.
However, the SSRIs themselves have characteristic
adverse effects; gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and
vomiting may be a problem, and sleep disturbances and anxiety
may be exacerbated at the start of treatment. Moreover, those in current clinical
use interact to varying degrees with cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, which
carries a potential for interaction with a wide range of compounds.
Why SNRIs are developed?
More
recently serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) such as duloxetine and venlafaxine
have been developed, as well as reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase
type A (RIMAs) such as moclobemide.
RIMAs offer a safer alternative to the MAOIs and fewer dietary
restrictions are necessary. Nefazodone,
mirtazapine, and reboxetine, which have slightly different
biochemical profiles from the major groups, are also more recent introductions.
Bupropion, another unrelated antidepressant, is also available in some countries. With the
exception of nefazodone, which
causes hepatotoxicity and venlafaxine,
which is cardiotoxic, most of these newer drugs seem to be associated
with fewer severe adverse effects; their efficacy is also comparable to
that of the tricyclics(TCA) and SSRIs.
[Toxicity of
the SNRI venlafaxine in overdose appears to be greater than other new
serotonergic antidepressants and comparable to some of the less toxic
tricyclics]
Which drugs used for Atypical Depression?
Other
drugs used in the treatment of depression include flupentixol, the antidepressant
dose of which is lower than that used for the treatment of psychoses.
Ademetionine, the active derivative
of methionine, has been tried in
depressive disorders, and extracts of the plant St John’s wort are
widely used in some countries for depression.
Transdermal
patches containing selegiline, an irreversible
inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type B, are available in the USA for the
treatment of depression. * The use
of an MAOI may be considered in patients with atypical depression.
Why Lithium is the most standard antidepressant drug?
Lithium may be used for the prophylaxis of recurrent unipolar depression as an
alternative to standard antidepressants,
although it is more commonly used in the management of bipolar disorder
(see above); its role in unipolar depression is more usually to augment
the effect of standard antidepressants
in treatment-resistant disease.
What is the use of Sedative Antidepressants?
One
of the less sedative antidepressants
should be used where appropriate, although care is needed with all psychotropic
drugs, especially at the start of treatment. Regardless of antidepressant choice, certain principles of management apply when
starting antidepressant therapy.
*The
sedative properties of some of the antidepressants
may adversely affect the performance of potentially hazardous tasks such as
driving and the operation of machinery.
How to start treatment and change drugs for newer patients?
Antidepressants
often causes toxic effects like antimuscarinic and cardiotoxic effects and no
analysis can tell us the actual about starting antidepressant therapy for newer
or older patients. However the following method is recommended before starting
any antidepressant therapy:
• A
low initial dose will minimise adverse effects; this is then increased
until an adequate response is observed. When this is done with the newer antidepressants, including the SSRIs, the dose can generally be
increased after a few days; for the tricyclics
the increase should be more gradual. Gradual introduction of treatment is
of particular importance in the elderly who may be more susceptible to
adverse effects.
•
Although some adverse effects of antidepressant
drugs appear soon after treatment is started, there is a delay of about 2
weeks before any therapeutic benefit is observed, and at least 6 weeks
before maximum improvement in depressive symptoms occurs. Claims of a fast onset
of action have been made for several antidepressants,
but in a review of data relating to onset of action with currently available antidepressants, none have been
shown conclusively to work faster than any other. This delay in benefit may
relate to a combination of pharmacokinetic and neuro-chemical factors.
•
Patients should not be considered resistant to the chosen drug until they have
been maintained at an adequate dose for at least 4 weeks (the BNF and
NICE2 have recommended 6 weeks in the elderly). Patients with a partial
response should continue for a further 2 weeks (6 weeks in the elderly)
before being considered resistant. Treatment
failure is often due to subtherapeutic doses, particularly with the older tricyclics whose adverse
effects limit maximum tolerable doses in many patients. Where lack of
compliance leads to sub-therapeutic doses therapeutic drug monitoring may be of
value.
How to use Antidepressants for those who are already failed in first-line treatment (treatment-resistance problem)?
•
Switching to an alternative antidepressant
•
Adding another drug (augmentation), particularly if there has been a partial
response
•
Introducing psychological treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy guidelines
generally consider it preferable to try an alternative single antidepressant before giving
combinations of drugs (augmentation).
It
has been suggested that for practical purposes a patient should not be
considered to have treatment-resistant depression until 2 or more
consecutive antidepressants at adequate doses have been tried without response.
If switching antidepressants the choice is between a drug from the same pharmacological group or one from a
different group.
In
the UK, venlafaxine is usually
reserved for patients with treatment-resistant
depression because of its adverse cardiovascular effects and toxicity in
overdose. MAOIs can also be tried in
patients who are refractory to or intolerant of treatment with other antidepressants.
Pindolol has also been studied as an augmentation agent with
several SSRIs and other serotonergic antidepressants. Another
method is to combine different classes of antidepressants.
Although this has been used successfully in the treatment of drug-resistant
depression, it may result in enhanced adverse reactions or interactions
and the BNF considers it hardly ever justified; it should only ever be done
under expert supervision.
If
the response to treatment is good, the patient should continue with the same
treatment for at least 4 to 6 months, and perhaps 12 months in the elderly; symptoms
are likely to recur if treatment is stopped too soon.
What is time intervals required when changing antidepressant drugs?
When
changing a patient from one type of antidepressant
to another an appropriate drug-free interval may be needed. An MAOI (including a RIMA and selegiline) should
not be started until at least one week after stopping a tricyclic antidepressant, an SSRI, or any related antidepressant; in the case of bupropion, mirtazapine, and the SSRI
sertraline the drug-free interval is
extended to 2 weeks, and for fluoxetine,
to 5 weeks because of their longer half-lives.
For
the tricyclics clomipramine and imipramine
a drugfree interval of 3 weeks
should be allowed. Conversely, 2 weeks should elapse between stopping
MAOI (including selegiline) therapy and starting patients on a tricyclic antidepressant (3 weeks in the case of clomipramine or imipramine), an SSRI, or
any related antidepressant.
No
treatment-free period is necessary between stopping a reversible inhibitor of
monoamine oxidase type A (RIMA) and starting an SSRI or another antidepressant.
Drugs that have been used in augmentation strategies for resistant
depression include lithium, thyroid hormones (liothyronine), and central stimulants such as methylphenidate.
What is treatment management when reducing and stopping antidepressant drugs?
In general, the dose should not be reduced for this continuation phase. Continuing therapy beyond this phase is a matter of clinical judgement and should take into account the number of prior episodes, any residual symptoms, and the severity of the episode.
Maintenance therapy should be considered for recurrent
depressive disorders, and may be necessary for several years, if not
indefinitely, in some cases.
Again,
full therapeutic doses are recommended for prophylaxis
rather than reduced doses. Suddenly stopping antidepressant therapy after regular use for 8 weeks or more may
precipitate withdrawal symptoms.
Common
symptoms seen after antidepressant withdrawal include headache, anorexia,
nausea, insomnia, and anxiety; the SSRIs have also been associated with
episodes of dizziness and paraesthesia which are rarely seen with
the tricyclics.
Withdrawal
reactions may be more severe with the MAOIs especially tranylcypromine.
To minimise symptoms, most guidelines and authorities such as the BNF recommend reducing the dose over a
period of about 4 weeks, although considerably longer periods (6 months) may be
required when withdrawing maintenance therapy. Depressive disorders may arise
in childhood and adolescence, the prevalence increasing with age.
Concerns
about a possible increased risk of suicide with antidepressant treatment, have led to considerable uncertainty
about appropriate management in young patients.
In
the UK, guidelines state that the mainstay of treatment for this patient group should be psychological therapy; treatment with antidepressants should only be offered alongside psychological therapy.
How to use Antidepressants for children?
For
children and adolescents with mild depression, as for adults, a period
of watchful waiting may be appropriate before starting any treatment. If
symptoms have not resolved after several weeks, patients should be started on
an appropriate course of psychological
therapy such as group cognitive
behavioural therapy or guided self-help
which should be continued for 2 to 3 months.
Antidepressants should not be used for the initial treatment of
mild depression. Children or adolescents with moderate to severe depression
(or those with mild depression unresponsive to the above measures) should be
given more specific psychological
treatment such as individual
cognitive behavioural therapy, interpersonal
therapy, or short term family
therapy. Combined treatment with an antidepressant
(which, as in adults, appears more effective than either alone) should only be
considered if there is a lack of response to psychotherapy alone.
The
SSRI fluoxetine is considered the first-choice antidepressant in
children aged and over because of proven efficacy and low
toxicity in overdose; although the evidence for its efficacy in younger children
has been questioned, a review by the EMEA concluded that studies showed a
positive effect and allowed its use throughout the EU in children from 8 years of
age. The other SSRIs should not be
used in children because of a lack of demonstrated efficacy and/or an increased
risk of a harmful outcome.
Similar
recommendations have been made for the SNRI
venlafaxine. Patients who remain unresponsive
to combined treatment should be initially tried on an alternative psychological
therapy.
How to change antidepressant drugs (for children)?
A
change in antidepressant may also be
warranted and guidelines issued in the UK have suggested that citalopram and sertraline may be appropriate, provided certain criteria have been
met. (Paroxetine and venlafaxine should not be used.) Lithium has also been tried and ECT may be considered for older
children with severe, unresponsive depression.
Tricyclics may have a modest effect in the treatment of
depression in adolescents; however,
they are not effective in the treatment of younger children. In practice
they have often been reserved for refractory cases in adolescents although
evidence to support this role is lacking recent UK guidelines do not
recommend their use.
There
have also been reports of death due to cardiotoxicity
in children taking tricyclic
antidepressants, in particular desipramine
and imipramine. Following the concerns
raised about the possible increased risk of suicide
in children and adolescents treated with antidepressants, the FDA undertook a meta-analysis of 372 studies
in adults. From 295 studies in psychiatric patients, the overall risk of
suicide was not increased, but there was a trend toward increased risk with
younger age.
Although
the effect was not statistically significant, the FDA considered the trend
sufficiently convincing to warn that, like children and adolescents, young
adults (aged 18 to 24 years) treated with antidepressants
of any type may be at increased risk of suicidal
thinking and behaviour. In the UK, an Expert Working Group of the CSM
found no clear evidence that use of SSRIs
in young adults increased the risk of self-harm
or suicidal thoughts. However, it was noted
that such patients have a higher background risk of
suicidal behavior than older adults and consequently should be
closely monitored during treatment.
What are the appropriate Antidepressants for Geriatric patients?
Depression
in the elderly is not uncommon and may affect up to 4% of this population.57
Suicide is also more frequent in the elderly than in the general population and
depressive symptoms are present in about 80% of patients aged over 74 years who
commit suicide.
Depression
in the elderly is often undertreated and prognosis is poor; treatment
is also often complicated by co-existing medical conditions. SSRIs are often the first choice of
treatment in the elderly because of their favorable adverse effect
profile and low toxicity in overdose. They may be especially appropriate
in patients with an existing cardiovascular disease or in those taking other
medications that may lower the blood pressure.
Tricyclics such as amitriptyline
and imipramine are probably best
avoided in the elderly as their cardiotoxic, antimuscarinic,
and sedative effects may be particularly troublesome. However, the tricyclics desipramine and nortriptyline
are considered by some to be an alternative first-choice as they are
less cardiotoxic and have fewer antimuscarinic and sedative actions
compared with amitriptyline or imipramine.
Other
newer antidepressants may also be
useful in specific situations; bupropion,
which has the advantage of a relative lack of cardiotoxicity and drug
interactions, may be an appropriate option. Lower initial doses of antidepressant drugs are often
recommended in the elderly to minimise adverse effects but individual
differences in metabolism and excretion may mean that some patients are
undertreated.
The
elderly tend to respond more slowly to antidepressants than younger patients nd additional psychosocial or psychotherapeutic management is often warranted. The treatment of resistant depression in elderly patients
should follow the same principles as in younger patients. ECT is also safe and effective in the
elderly, and should be considered in those at high
risk for suicide or who are refractory to or intolerant of antidepressant drugs.
Depression
late in life may require long-term antidepressant
treatment beyond the recovery phase, even after first episodes of
depression and should be a continuation
of the treatment that was successful in the initial acute phase.
What are the usages of antidepressants for pregnant mothers?
Treatment
of women with depressive disorders during and after pregnancy raises
concerns about the risk of teratogenicity,
fetal growth retardation, or perinatal
problems (see also individual drug monographs); the ratio of risk to the
child versus the benefit to the mother must therefore be considered very
carefully. It should also be remembered that untreated depression during
pregnancy has been associated with poor neonatal outcomes such as low birthweight.
In
some cases starting treatment with an antidepressant
will be appropriate although psychotherapy
and ECT should also be considered as
alternatives. Treatment should not be stopped as a matter of routine in
early pregnancy in women who become pregnant while taking an antidepressant. Maternal mood disorders in the immediate postpartum period are related
to hormonal changes, particularly falling progesterone levels; the
symptoms are mild and resolve spontaneously after several days, therefore no
treatment is required.
Of
greater concern are major depressive episodes that occur beyond this initial
phase, which are clinically identical to depressive disorders in general
and call for the same principles of management (although there are few studies
to support this). These depressive episodes have been found to be related to
the presence of immediate postpartum
mood disorders, although no hormonal basis to this association has been identified.
Nevertheless,
there has been interest in the use of estrogen
as a treatment. As with use of any
medication in breast-feeding mothers, the risks to
the infant from drugs distributed into breast milk must be considered.
The American Academy of Pediatrics considers that all antidepressants are drugs whose effect on nursing infants could
be of concern.
What to do when Anxiety and Depression present at the same time?
Symptoms
of anxiety and depression often coexist, and although it may be
difficult to distinguish which is the predominant disorder, especially
in milder forms, patients usually require an antidepressant. Anxiolytics
and antipsychotics can be useful
adjuncts in agitated depression, but a sedative antidepressant might be preferable. Combination preparations
of antidepressants with antipsychotics or anxiolytics should not be used because the dosage of the
individual components should be adjusted separately.
Also, anxiolytics should only be prescribed on a short term basis whereas antidepressants are given for longer periods. The efficacy of antidepressants in chronic fatigue syndrome in clinical studies have been equivocal although it has been suggested that antidepressant therapy should be tried in patients with co-existing depression. Cognitive therapy may also be useful.
0 Comments